- From: Grig Gheorghiu <
>
- To:
- Subject: [chef] Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Can you recommend a command-and-control tool?
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:24:41 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=xg+Z5dzDo9NpOqt4xjGZUikJRJf9sqpdNA4kZSF599LMC754EU14ZQIHraH7V+2/o/ jW+27EMgYR7pvUizHuUAibo1cOpM4tiPla0GXH2HT21xyYTZs8h+PPmka2FpaLZGFn7E z7egGXOWsA5wfYEywQO+EbL6lN8pNEU6Yk1/s=
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Michael Hale
<
>
wrote:
>
Capistrano will probably work fine for running interactive commands
>
for a smallish number of hosts, but it is essentially a fancy for loop
>
and will reach a point where the number of connections from your local
>
box will exceed your uplink. Also it does not have the ability to
>
non-interactivley do callbacks. For example a webserver comes online
>
and it broadcasts that it is ready to be added to the load balancer,
>
the load balancer then runs chef to update it's config with the new
>
webserver.
>
I am not familiar with RunDeck -- does it provide the callback feature
you describe? I guess I could just go read the docs ;-)
Grig
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.