[chef] Re: Re: Re: CentOS 5 and 6 AMIs or boxes

[Patrick Debois < >]

Just wanted to say, that veewee templates should include both chef and puppet as a default.

The centos definitions should be usable for both now.

you guys have fun with it

On 24/07/11 21:33, Charles Duffy wrote:

" type="cite">Hmm -- that veewee definition looks to be puppet-only.

I can't argue that _too_ much, though, as the one I use is Chef-only (using RBEL for packages): https://gist.github.com/1102993

On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:07 PM, AJ Christensen < "> > wrote:

Yo,

On 24 July 2011 12:04, James < "> > wrote:
> Does anyone have relatively clean CentOS 5 and 6 AMIs or vagrant boxes? I
> would prefer to use known good images to build Chef and dependencies rather
> than random AMIs which may or may not contain vulnerabilities. RedHat images
> are not an option because my amazon credits don't cover them.

There are veewee definitions for centos6.0, probably that other junk
too. https://github.com/jedi4ever/veewee/pull/78

Check out the chef-box project from @dysinger; you might be able to
make use of it.

https://github.com/dysinger/chef-box

–AJ