[chef] Re: Re: Re: Re: bootstrapping chef

[Joshua Blatt < >]

Unless you use 1.9 features in which case they won't be.

On 05/04/2012 02:27 PM, Adam Jacob wrote:
> Which, if you are just writing chef recipes, they will be.
>
> Adam
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Joshua 
> Blatt<
>  >
>   wrote:
> > Tried omnibus on CentOS 6.0.   It just worked which was nice, but Ruby is
> > limited to the 1.8.7 which means our Chef recipes cannot make use of any
> > 1.9.x features if we want them to be portable.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 05/04/2012 01:52 PM, John Martinez wrote:
> >
> > +1 Omnibus
> >
> > We're on CentOS/Fedora/Amazon/Windows
> >
> > On May 4, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Charles Sullivan wrote:
> >
> > +1 for Omnibus..
> >
> > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Matt 
> > Ray<
> >  >
> >   wrote:
> > > Which platforms do you need? There is already a wide range of
> > > supported platforms, let us know what you need and we can point you in
> > > the right direction.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Matt Ray
> > > Senior Technical Evangelist | Opscode Inc.
> > >
> > >  
> > >  | (512) 731-2218
> > > Twitter, IRC, GitHub: mattray
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Joshua 
> > > Blatt<
> > >  >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi guys,
> > > >
> > > > I'm relatively new to Chef, but I've already noticed that one of the
> > > > biggest
> > > > pains we have is getting Chef to work on a new platform.   Once Chef
> > > > works
> > > > we leave the world of crappy shell scripts and enter the world of Chef.
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone come up with any nice scripts to get Chef and its
> > > > dependencies
> > > > installed and happy on a variety of platforms/images?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Josh
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Charles Sullivan
> >
> >