[chef] Re: Re: Yum package provider always succeeding

[Jason Boxman < >]

Sure, but I am using the community cookbooks for several things and no
version is set for those; I certainly could modify each recipe in
turn, but I wanted to avoid that.

On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Daniel Condomitti
<
 >
 wrote:
> If you define a version on the package I don't think it contacts the remote
> repo so it should just keep going.
>
> On Saturday, October 27, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Jason Boxman wrote:
>
> What might I redefine so I can temporarily have my package provider
> always succeed? The relevant packages are already installed, but the
> related repository may not be reachable, so I'd like to have the chef
> run still succeed.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Thursday next week is indeed time for a thorough insight
> into the swirling red debian vortex. — leeta
>
>



-- 
Thursday next week is indeed time for a thorough insight
into the swirling red debian vortex. — leeta