[chef] Re: Re: Re: documented breaking changes within the chef 10 releases?

[Jesse Campbell < >]

Aah. that explains. I went from RBEL provided chef 0.10.6 on ruby 1.8.7 to omnibus provided chef 10.16.2 (which should come with 1.9.1 or 1.9.2)

Thanks Steven, I was wondering if I was losing my mind here :D

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Steven Danna < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

On 12/21/12 8:29 AM, Daniel DeLeo wrote:
>
> On Friday, December 21, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Jesse Campbell wrote:
>
>> Anyone know if there's a list of breaking changes and major
>> improvements between 0.10.6 and now (10.16.2)?
> In general there shouldn't be any. We consider breaking changes in
> minor/patch versions to be regressions and fix them as we find them.
>
>>
>> So far I've discovered:
>> - an array of nodes (returned from search) used to be able to be
>> sorted with .sort, now that fails. Not in any release notes I've
>> found, not sure when it changed.
> I'm not sure how this ever worked for you. I checked out 0.10.6 in my
> git repo and was unable to sort nodes with a simple #sort call.
>
> https://gist.github.com/18e7bb1d74075c47f750

It appears this behaves differently on different Ruby versions. On Ruby
1.9.2 I get the error Dan posted.  On Ruby 1.8.7, no error is raised.

Cheers,

Steve


--
Steven Danna
Systems Engineer, Opscode, Inc
GPG Key: http://stevendanna.github.com/downloads/code/public.key