[chef] Re: Re: Re: Running a chef-handler via RVM-managed Ruby

[Sean OMeara < >]

Bento is the recommended way to roll Vagrant boxes for Chef.

https://github.com/opscode/bento

-s

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Graham Christensen 
<
 >
 wrote:
> Hi Cassiano,
>
> Most of the boxes available for Vagrant aren't using omnibus installations.
> You can make your own, Veewee makes this process very simple.
>
> I have done this myself:
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/gsc-vagrant-boxes/ubuntu-12.04-omnibus-chef.box
>
> You can make this box yourself:
> https://github.com/grahamc/vagrant-boxes-veewee
>
> --
> Graham Christensen
>
> On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Mike wrote:
>
> It looks like your vagrant box is executing Chef under the
> Vagrant-execution ruby 1.8.
>
> Have you tried running this with an Omnibus-built Chef-Client on Vagrant?
>
> -M
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Cassiano Leal 
> <
 >
> wrote:
>
> Is it possible? :)
>
> My problem is that I have a report handler that posts stats to stathat.com,
> and the gem is incompatible with ruby 1.8 (or so I figured).
>
> All my systems have 1.9.3 installed via RVM, and I want to use that for the
> handler. The gem installs ok using fnichol's rvm cookbook's gem_package
> recipe, but the handler still tries to run on the system Ruby (or the
> omnibus Ruby, maybe?) [0].
>
> Any clues?
>
> Thanks!
>
> - cassiano
>
> [0] https://gist.github.com/cassianoleal/5090866
>
>