- From: Sean OMeara <
>
- To: Adam Jacob <
>
- Cc: "
" <
>
- Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Re: Chef RFCs and You
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 02:51:12 -0400
Requesting for comments on RFCs as a service.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Adam Jacob
<
>
wrote:
>
Is this a problem for you? Luckily, we Noe have a process for changing it :)
>
would love to hear why.
>
>
Adam
>
>
On Sep 4, 2014 11:48 AM, "Phil Mocek"
>
<
>
>
wrote:
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
>
> Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
>
> > # What is an RFC?
>
>
>
> Why no mention of "request for comments" or rationale for the co-opting
>
> of a term that has been associated almost exclusively with the IETF and
>
> its ancestors since somewhere around the dawn of ARPANET nearly a
>
> half-century ago?
>
>
>
> - --
>
> Phil Mocek
>
> https://mocek.org
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUCLPqAAoJEHBmnnaB75b4Y+8P/0yVmfeTl1AsZ3eIOJB6Kvzm
>
> 2json6/0mhFlgtBlL/k7pk/zGTfhJyHOKQgV1tXRoodNDA+1fBVxMAr5HFiPql7J
>
> lUWOR48uMzIhK0jQb1YABkUSm/liaPyc+GaFfitgFYy+wUdPSO4y3sgGOH/NBXHF
>
> mOuM4u04rA3ViHYNfCwG1UDA9MpIQy9/mEkNC1gSVEr+YLXVANuP7BNwOqHtZwnZ
>
> ODIGgxDF4OZT+BJtcWXS8EGDo9n6fHD38EvO5m97QF0IDfkrhZxRMMHKYl8B6TKV
>
> ZUFjK0YjGq0UqJr/SURsqDV4HhDRLJreTOquoXsr4sY8N64lp+qszZNm6S5IxnQe
>
> f6F9++6aJMJHejnBft0xTmCXOVi7/SIpjBlD0uJi2gxOfKVE27KW5voIiDrE4I/K
>
> Vcqr3rJJ+7Luj6Tr/T2Zp/l7qWT6d/Dmed1wKQkWEUv9QG8lAFE41VWQXa/fDEng
>
> ZTSG58hUGwDy7vBhpzciJ8X2A17paFkznY46CX0nGRiNON9cU6UM6sw4hqgTDmqO
>
> tW45M/DBSh7ZaL/7DG0ChJr8x+kYqjF402kdhPavuA0yzd4aL4soE/N+YUB0/6+X
>
> 1vUFidNo59oCv1UxV9EAMA47TzBxfEKtKC99cxE0rNNEChoK4XUvBHHxC4vK8F+6
>
> ty4xD3aqtDkhG1YNFy8I
>
> =Jdmo
>
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.