[chef] Re: Re: Re: Chef RFCs and You


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Sean OMeara < >
  • To: Adam Jacob < >
  • Cc: " " < >
  • Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Re: Chef RFCs and You
  • Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 02:51:12 -0400

Requesting for comments on RFCs as a service.


On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Adam Jacob 
< >
 wrote:
> Is this a problem for you? Luckily, we Noe have a process for changing it :)
> would love to hear why.
>
> Adam
>
> On Sep 4, 2014 11:48 AM, "Phil Mocek" 
> < >
>  wrote:
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>> Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
>> > # What is an RFC?
>>
>> Why no mention of "request for comments" or rationale for the co-opting
>> of a term that has been associated almost exclusively with the IETF and
>> its ancestors since somewhere around the dawn of ARPANET nearly a
>> half-century ago?
>>
>> - --
>> Phil Mocek
>https://mocek.org
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUCLPqAAoJEHBmnnaB75b4Y+8P/0yVmfeTl1AsZ3eIOJB6Kvzm
>> 2json6/0mhFlgtBlL/k7pk/zGTfhJyHOKQgV1tXRoodNDA+1fBVxMAr5HFiPql7J
>> lUWOR48uMzIhK0jQb1YABkUSm/liaPyc+GaFfitgFYy+wUdPSO4y3sgGOH/NBXHF
>> mOuM4u04rA3ViHYNfCwG1UDA9MpIQy9/mEkNC1gSVEr+YLXVANuP7BNwOqHtZwnZ
>> ODIGgxDF4OZT+BJtcWXS8EGDo9n6fHD38EvO5m97QF0IDfkrhZxRMMHKYl8B6TKV
>> ZUFjK0YjGq0UqJr/SURsqDV4HhDRLJreTOquoXsr4sY8N64lp+qszZNm6S5IxnQe
>> f6F9++6aJMJHejnBft0xTmCXOVi7/SIpjBlD0uJi2gxOfKVE27KW5voIiDrE4I/K
>> Vcqr3rJJ+7Luj6Tr/T2Zp/l7qWT6d/Dmed1wKQkWEUv9QG8lAFE41VWQXa/fDEng
>> ZTSG58hUGwDy7vBhpzciJ8X2A17paFkznY46CX0nGRiNON9cU6UM6sw4hqgTDmqO
>> tW45M/DBSh7ZaL/7DG0ChJr8x+kYqjF402kdhPavuA0yzd4aL4soE/N+YUB0/6+X
>> 1vUFidNo59oCv1UxV9EAMA47TzBxfEKtKC99cxE0rNNEChoK4XUvBHHxC4vK8F+6
>> ty4xD3aqtDkhG1YNFy8I
>> =Jdmo
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§