- From: Noah Kantrowitz <
>
- To:
- Subject: [chef] Re: Chef RFCs and You
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 01:14:53 -0700
On Sep 4, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Phil Mocek
<
>
wrote:
>
Signed PGP part
>
Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
>
> # What is an RFC?
>
>
Why no mention of "request for comments" or rationale for the co-opting
>
of a term that has been associated almost exclusively with the IETF and
>
its ancestors since somewhere around the dawn of ARPANET nearly a
>
half-century ago?
It was discussed when RFC0 was proposed as to if it would cause confusion.
The conclusion was that in context it is highly unlikely to result in a case
where there is substantial semantic overlap. I could definitely get behind
the abbreviation CRFC to further distinguish things though. As for not
mentioning it in this post, it was intended as a gentle overview :)
--Noah
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.