- From: "Julian C. Dunn" <
>
- To: "
" <
>
- Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Re: Chef Metal vs. Vagrant
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:55:51 -0500
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Torben Knerr
<
>
wrote:
>
Is the intention to provide some common abstractions (e.g for cloud
>
queues, object storage, load balancers, etc) like Vagrant does for
>
virtual machines too? Or is the aim to simply provide a higher level
>
configuration DSL in favor of the specific commandline tools?
I'm not sure. John Keiser would be the best person to answer.
However... I have talked to some folks about this and they've warned
us off the idea, because there is actually less commonality than you
might think amongst the cloud providers.
Since I don't have broad operational experience with anything beyond
AWS I thought I'd merely relate that. If anyone can weigh in, we'd
certainly welcome the feedback.
- Julian
--
[ Julian C. Dunn
<
>
* Sorry, I'm ]
[ WWW:
http://www.aquezada.com/staff/julian * only Web 1.0 ]
[
gopher://sdf.org/1/users/keymaker/ * compliant! ]
[ PGP: 91B3 7A9D 683C 7C16 715F 442C 6065 D533 FDC2 05B9 ]
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.