General discussion about Chef

[chef] Re: Re: Re: Chef 12.5 and ChefDK 0.9 release candidates available!


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jos Backus < >
  • To: " " < >
  • Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Re: Chef 12.5 and ChefDK 0.9 release candidates available!
  • Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 00:27:27 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
I see, thanks Lamont!

Cheers,
Jos

From: Lamont Granquist
Reply-To: " "> "
Date: Thursday, October 1, 2015 at 5:18 PM
To: " "> "
Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Chef 12.5 and ChefDK 0.9 release candidates available!



On 10/01/2015 12:07 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
" type="cite">
Congratulations!

Any chance we can name resources explicitly rather than being tied to <cookbook>_<filename>? Like ‘provides :foo’?


You can already do that with even the very old provides syntax that was in Chef 11:

https://www.chef.io/blog/2015/02/10/chef-12-provider-resolver/

See the "LWRP usage" and the following note on the limitations of backcompat to Chef 11.

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§