- From: Adam Jacob <
>
- To: John Vincent <
>
- Cc: AJ Christensen <
>,
, Bryan Berry <
>, Bryan McLellan <
>, Darrin Eden <
>, sean escriva <
>
- Subject: [chef-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: CHEF-2988 allowed_recipes, restricted_recipes, and override_recipes
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:55:27 -0700
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:44 PM, John Vincent
<
>
wrote:
>
1) my runs take too long
>
2) I want to do a one off thing
So, besides the fact that some users want to do what you feel like is
a bad thing, is there a reason not to include it?
I think it's a bad idea (tm) to do one-off runs without having done a
complete converge in the near-term past (the side effects demand it!)
- but I can see the value in doing something like this for things like
triggered application deployments, where I know I want to trigger a
single subset of the run list.
My feeling is we shouldn't dismiss functionality some set of us find
useful simply out of dogmatic adherence to a model another (probably
majority) of us *do* like, unless it's really damaging to Chef. I
don't see how this is, other than being a little afraid of what
happens in infrastructure that relies on it a lot.
Nothing stops us from shipping it and making it obsolete by having a
more awesome way to do it.
Adam
--
Opscode, Inc.
Adam Jacob, Chief Customer Officer
T: (206) 619-7151 E:
- [chef-dev] CHEF-2988 allowed_recipes, restricted_recipes, and override_recipes, Bryan McLellan, 03/21/2012
- [chef-dev] Re: CHEF-2988 allowed_recipes, restricted_recipes, and override_recipes, John Vincent, 03/21/2012
- [chef-dev] Re: CHEF-2988 allowed_recipes, restricted_recipes, and override_recipes, Erik Hollensbe, 03/21/2012
- [chef-dev] Re: CHEF-2988 allowed_recipes, restricted_recipes, and override_recipes, Ringo De Smet, 03/22/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.