- From: Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten <
>
- To: Matt Ray <
>
- Cc: Chef Developers <
>, Joshua Timberman <
>
- Subject: [chef-dev] Homebrew As OS X Default Package Provider
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:24:42 -0700
We haven't needed to add macports to the omnibus-client or dev toolchain. I
think the same is true for homebrew.
On Jul 25, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Matt Ray
<
>
wrote:
>
If the default package manager is Homebrew, does this mean we need to
>
add it to the omnibus-client package for OSX? What about the whole OSX
>
dev toolchain?
>
>
Thanks,
>
Matt Ray
>
Director of Partner Integration :: Chef
>
512.731.2218 ::
>
>
mattray :: GitHub :: IRC :: Twitter
>
>
>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Waldo G
>
<
>
>
wrote:
>
> Agreed.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Dreamcat4
>
> <
>
>
> wrote:
>
>>
>
>> Yes.
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten
>
>> <
>
>
>> wrote:
>
>>>
>
>>> I may be a MacPorts package maintainer, but this is the right default. +1
>
>>>
>
>>> --
>
>>> http://josephholsten.com
>
>>>
>
>>> On Jul 24, 2014, at 3:17, Joshua Timberman
>
>>> <
>
>
>>> wrote:
>
>>>
>
>>> Ohai Chefs!
>
>>>
>
>>> I opened an issue in chef-rfc about making homebrew the default provider
>
>>> for the package resource on OS X systems.
>
>>>
>
>>> https://github.com/opscode/chef-rfc/issues/28
>
>>>
>
>>> While I'd like to see this happen for Chef 12, I think given the
>
>>> backwards compatibility issue makes that too aggressive. I'd love to hear
>
>>> folks thoughts though. Please comment!
>
>>>
>
>>> Thank you,
>
>>> Joshua
>
>>
>
>>
>
>
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.