- From: Daniel DeLeo <
>
- To: Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten <
>
- Cc: Matt Ray <
>, Chef Developers <
>, Joshua Timberman <
>
- Subject: [chef-dev] Re: Homebrew As OS X Default Package Provider
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:57:35 -0700
Yeah, I think this falls in the same category as git, svn, easy_install, and
(in some cases) powershell, where we provide resources that depend on
functionality that isn’t available out of the box. It’s a bit weird that this
is a package resource that requires extra config before you can use it, but
that’s OS X for you.
--
Daniel DeLeo
On Friday, July 25, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten wrote:
>
We haven't needed to add macports to the omnibus-client or dev toolchain. I
>
think the same is true for homebrew.
>
>
On Jul 25, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Matt Ray
>
<
>
>
(mailto:
)>
>
wrote:
>
>
> If the default package manager is Homebrew, does this mean we need to
>
> add it to the omnibus-client package for OSX? What about the whole OSX
>
> dev toolchain?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt Ray
>
> Director of Partner Integration :: Chef
>
> 512.731.2218 ::
>
>
>
>
>
> (mailto:
)
>
> mattray :: GitHub :: IRC :: Twitter
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Waldo G
>
> <
>
>
>
> (mailto:
)>
>
> wrote:
>
> > Agreed.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Dreamcat4
>
> > <
>
> >
>
> > (mailto:
)>
>
> > wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > > Yes.
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten
>
> > > <
>
> > >
>
> > > (mailto:
)>
>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > >
>
> > > > I may be a MacPorts package maintainer, but this is the right
>
> > > > default. +1
>
> > > >
>
> > > > --
>
> > > > http://josephholsten.com
>
> > > >
>
> > > > On Jul 24, 2014, at 3:17, Joshua Timberman
>
> > > > <
>
> > > >
>
> > > > (mailto:
)>
>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > >
>
> > > > Ohai Chefs!
>
> > > >
>
> > > > I opened an issue in chef-rfc about making homebrew the default
>
> > > > provider
>
> > > > for the package resource on OS X systems.
>
> > > >
>
> > > > https://github.com/opscode/chef-rfc/issues/28
>
> > > >
>
> > > > While I'd like to see this happen for Chef 12, I think given the
>
> > > > backwards compatibility issue makes that too aggressive. I'd love
>
> > > > to hear
>
> > > > folks thoughts though. Please comment!
>
> > > >
>
> > > > Thank you,
>
> > > > Joshua
>
> > >
>
> >
>
>
>
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.