General discussion about Chef

mkfs and mdadm support


Chronological Thread 
  • From: snacktime <snacktime@gmail.com>
  • To: chef@lists.opscode.com
  • Subject: mkfs and mdadm support
  • Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:18:59 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=fE5NTV56UpufuyEq4NNI2LZinPaa1gBV7+TX1snVYXQoJknfpD8T4HyQQiJbfZB2MY pwigxr8yYEwlsXmBm8DHuQ95NKMi9c/yHW/KKKZZlicodARyzn5QrTYdxR2LeifrTbK/ sXuFCn/QTuBu8/2hEHdn4GsJW+bKRNTwOnk2Y=
I've got an ec2 recipe that uses the mount provider and my own custom code to handle mkfs and mdadm.  I'm going to add support directly to chef for these.  I'm thinking they should each be a provider on their own.  Thoughts?

Chris



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§