- From: Mike <
>
- To:
- Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Redhat admins, if a cookbook enables EPEL, is that a surprise?
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:41:32 -0500
Bryan,
Most of our deployments require any number of packages that aren't in
RHEL default, and EPL has them. So adding EPEL via "yum::epel" is one
of our first-called recipes.
-Mike
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jamie Winsor
<
>
wrote:
>
Bryan,
>
>
Our application cookbooks will enable EPEL if they are attempting to
>
retrieve a package which requires it. The same goes for any of our library
>
cookbooks which have a package contained there. We always make these
>
cookbooks configurable, though, so you can instead retrieve your package out
>
of a self hosted repository.
>
>
EPEL is more of a sensible default for us.
>
>
--
>
Jamie Winsor
>
@resetexistence
>
https://github.com/reset
>
>
On Friday, November 16, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Bryan McLellan wrote:
>
>
Would you be surprised if you ran a community cookbook for a piece of
>
software and it configured EPEL to do so?
>
>
It seems like getting most things done requires it, but we haven't made a
>
global pattern yet to override the use of EPEL yet.
>
>
If everyone just uses EPEL, then it is a moot point.
>
>
---
>
Bryan McLellan | opscode | technical program manager, open source
>
(c) 206.607.7108 | (t) @btmspox | (b) http://blog.loftninjas.org
>
>
- [chef] Redhat admins, if a cookbook enables EPEL, is that a surprise?, Bryan McLellan, 11/16/2012
- [chef] Re: Redhat admins, if a cookbook enables EPEL, is that a surprise?, Jamie Winsor, 11/16/2012
- [chef] Re: Redhat admins, if a cookbook enables EPEL, is that a surprise?, Bryan Berry, 11/16/2012
- [chef] Re: Redhat admins, if a cookbook enables EPEL, is that a surprise?, Eric G. Wolfe, 11/16/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.