[chef] Re: Re: Cookbook Versioning Policy

[Kevin Christen < >]

Mike,

Let's do it. I'll email you offline to coordinate.

Thanks,
Kevin Christen

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Mike < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

Hi Kevin,

This is really a great question. In the recent Chef Community Summit,
I raised the topic for discussion, and it seems that everyone agrees
with the SemVer approach, and now we have to do a few things:

1. Ensure the tools can understand SemVer version strings - from Chef,
Knife, etc to potentially extending Librarian, Berkshelf, Knife-spork,
et al.

2. Define what constitues the amount of change for each level of versioning.

I think the second one might be a good place to start, and
unfortunately I don't think there's any documents published yet. I'd
be happy to collaborate with you to come up with some drafts and see
what makes most sense and then we can push it up for community review.

Thoughts?
-Mike Fiedler

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Kevin Christen
< "> > wrote:
> My organization has been using chef-solo for about 9 months, and we're
> making the move to chef server. I'm going to need to provide guidance to
> cookbook developers on bumping cookbook versions. I plan to follow the
> semantic versioning (http://semver.org/) guidelines, where a non-backward
> compatible change results in a major version bump, a backward compatible
> change results in a minor version bump, and anything else results in a micro
> version bump.
>
> I think I can provide guidance on what kind of cookbook changes are backward
> compatible and what kinds aren't, but I imagine some else has already done
> that. Are there existing cookbook versioning policy documents that I could
> rely on?
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin Christen