[chef] Re: Re: Re: Re: Kubernetes Cookbook


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Joe Nuspl < >
  • To:
  • Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Re: Re: Kubernetes Cookbook
  • Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 08:48:54 -0800

While you answered the letter of the question, did it answer the spirit of the question?

Useful answers might have been:

We use cookbook X and it is the greatest thing since sliced bread.

We use cookbook Y and it is Ubuntu focused.  We had to make a lot changes to get it to work on CentOS.

I looked at cookbook Z but it has not been updated to work with Chef 12.

Just my 2 cents.

Joe

On Mar 6, 2015, at 6:26 AM, Angus Buchanan < "> > wrote:

Hello,

I provided an answer to the question, which gave the information required.  Yeah, maybe it was *very slightly* sarcastic, but I don't see how that was unwelcoming, uninclusive, unfriendly, or impatient.  It wasn't inconsiderate, or unprofessional.  It didn't use any words other than the URL.

OTOH, asking a busy mailing list full of busy and largely unpaid people a question that could be answered with 10 seconds googling could well be considered inconsiderate, disrepectful and unprofessional.

Just a perspective.

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Charles Johnson < " target="_blank"> > wrote:
Hi Angus!

While I can understand that easily answered questions such as these are frustrating, please don't respond to the user list in this way.

A quick refresher on our community guidelines:

- Be welcoming, inclusive, friendly, and patient.
- Be considerate.
- Be respectful.
- Be professional.
- Be careful in the words that you choose.
- When we disagree, let’s all work together to understand why.


Let's keep the mailing list a welcoming place.

Thanks!
--Charles

On March 5, 2015 at 7:03:52 AM, Angus Buchanan ( " target="_blank"> ) wrote:


On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Malli Pulla Reddy < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

Hi Chefs,

 

Any Cookbook available for kubernetes setup….?

 

PullaReddy

 






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§