That reflection in the standing agenda is due to the current shape of who maintains the bulk of the project. I expect it will change quite a bit as we change how the process works. Given the standing agenda is a backstop rather than fixed (the first meeting agenda won't be the standing one) - I'm not worried about it.
Adam
On Jul 7, 2014, at 2:59 PM, Adam Jacob < "> > wrote:
> Hi guys! As I mentioned in the blog post I wrote a few days back, we should start having regular developer meetings in IRC. The following pull request is my stab at how we should hold those meetings, and a proposed standing agenda (that I expect will change dramatically as we evolve.)
>
> Note that I do not expect the first meeting to follow the standard agenda.
>
> https://github.com/opscode/chef-rfc/pull/14
>
> When I get 3 thumbsups, I'm going to merge it.
>
> Feedback super welcomed.
I think the idea looks good overall. My only concern is that the standing agenda reads very much like this being "ChefInc broadcasts updates" and less of a participatory discussion. I don't think it would actually work out like that, but I would like to see it reflected at least a little if things are going to be codified like this.
--Noah
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.