[chef] Re: Syslog by default? Vote now!


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Joel Merrick < >
  • To:
  • Subject: [chef] Re: Syslog by default? Vote now!
  • Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:18:24 +0100
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YpJRF8duDUndAZBfEyWx/aSpRqVbPYCCsceOCMgokvhaPr2FVK089MROXwRUZIdBoP dPxor6Hty2VK/cgtTO8kZC8763r9egr6CLAP6UBhCL/UcGBu112EW+EvJIRoopQT69jW BBWtPVOS31rYSbSQHI/xuJ7BSBZzK477rnXrU=

+1 For Syslog :)

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Adam Jacob 
< >
 wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Bryan Liles 
> < >
>  wrote:
>>> Is there any reason why chef-client and chef-server shouldn't log to
>>> syslog by default?
>>
>> I second this question.  Is there any reason why?
>
> Other than my general dislike of Syslog, probably not.  If the
> majority of you want it to log to syslog by default, I'm happy to
> switch.  Drop your +1/-1 in reply.
>
> Adam
>
> --
> Opscode, Inc.
> Adam Jacob, CTO
> T: (206) 508-7449 E: 
> 
>



-- 
$ echo "kpfmAdpoofdufevq/dp/vl" | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge'



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§