[chef] Re: Re: Re: Syslog by default? Vote now!

[Thom May < >]

I'd second joshua's comments that if we have a tty i'd really like to
see output to it and to where ever we end up logging to,
but that said +1 for syslog by default.
-T

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Nate Mueller 
<
 >
 wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Joe Van Dyk 
> <
 >
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Adam Jacob 
>> <
 >
>>  wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Bryan Liles 
>> > <
 >
>> >  wrote:
>> >>> Is there any reason why chef-client and chef-server shouldn't log to
>> >>> syslog by default?
>> >>
>> >> I second this question.  Is there any reason why?
>> >
>> > Other than my general dislike of Syslog, probably not.  If the
>> > majority of you want it to log to syslog by default, I'm happy to
>> > switch.  Drop your +1/-1 in reply.
>>
>> I'd be happy if the default was rsyslog.  My general thought is that
>> chef should do the right thing by default, and make it easy to
>> customize.
>>
>> The right thing is centralized logging via rsyslog.
>>
>> --
>> Joe Van Dyk
>> http://fixieconsulting.com
>
>