General discussion about Chef

[chef] Re: Re: Syslog by default? Vote now!


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Nate Mueller < >
  • To:
  • Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Syslog by default? Vote now!
  • Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:35:57 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=BS98QJF4sghQkWgEs6UfK4wx7RKMhoGJBK3h+/2sFcvh/sSoyVTXv8BESkLtlCzXdC NRlMxkUoTmXE2X8a2Vn3jsxp6TicBgEsessJP0BRoM+2wIehHl7/7khIyhdnTA00AzyQ mx0MzqyW/avY/xi6OGbWWUcCnEC6AUQvV6HUc=
+1

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Joe Van Dyk < "> > wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Adam Jacob < "> > wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Bryan Liles < "> > wrote:
>>> Is there any reason why chef-client and chef-server shouldn't log to
>>> syslog by default?
>>
>> I second this question.  Is there any reason why?
>
> Other than my general dislike of Syslog, probably not.  If the
> majority of you want it to log to syslog by default, I'm happy to
> switch.  Drop your +1/-1 in reply.

I'd be happy if the default was rsyslog.  My general thought is that
chef should do the right thing by default, and make it easy to
customize.

The right thing is centralized logging via rsyslog.

--
Joe Van Dyk
http://fixieconsulting.com


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§