General discussion about Chef

[chef] Re: Syslog by default? Vote now!


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Joe Van Dyk < >
  • To:
  • Subject: [chef] Re: Syslog by default? Vote now!
  • Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:48:25 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=SAqdKSi4INx1Coc8sXPTI/bEwNIb73G1Lovi6wCvsZugYkkUexdjNLRwnkdewU/KHp M2sCFnN54WthaIJoqiRXdl3gYm0NxtcY+0QKGgq/QUSTAUyxTSHRKyRKXzPA2OhDKCN7 oTLPR0tlE/jvw0aDKdopZg16PZpu501IJv0VE=
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Adam Jacob 
< >
 wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Bryan Liles 
> < >
>  wrote:
>>> Is there any reason why chef-client and chef-server shouldn't log to
>>> syslog by default?
>>
>> I second this question.  Is there any reason why?
>
> Other than my general dislike of Syslog, probably not.  If the
> majority of you want it to log to syslog by default, I'm happy to
> switch.  Drop your +1/-1 in reply.

I'd be happy if the default was rsyslog.  My general thought is that
chef should do the right thing by default, and make it easy to
customize.

The right thing is centralized logging via rsyslog.

-- 
Joe Van Dyk
http://fixieconsulting.com

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

§