[chef] Re: Re: Re: Berkshelf with chef-repo: am I doing it right?

[Cassiano Leal < >]

I have more than one Chef Server, each with their own set of data bags, roles, nodes, cookbooks, etc.

While I don’t commit my cookbooks to the chef-repo’ VCS, I still maintain a cookbooks/ directory in it (which is on .gitignore), and keep everything that’s part of that Chef infrastructure under the chef-repo root path.

Cookbooks and their dependencies are managed and uploaded using Berkshelf, so I only have the cookbooks I’m working on under chef-repo/cookbooks.

I don’t ever use "knife cookbook upload”. Instead I use “berks upload” from the cookbook’s root.

--

Cassiano Leal

http://cassianoleal.com

http://twitter.com/cassianoleal

On Friday, November 29, 2013 at 09:54, Vladimir Skubriev wrote:

29.11.2013 14:47, Kevin Yank пишет:

On 29 Nov 2013, at 2:27 pm, Kevin Yank < "> > wrote:

Is this how others are using Berkshelf with a chef-repo, or have I missed something?

Answering my own question, I finally stumbled on a GitHub Issue that explains it all. If only the docs did as well!

I’ve posted my own summary for the curious:

https://github.com/berkshelf/berkshelf/issues/535#issuecomment-29508430

--

Kevin Yank

Chief Technology Officer, Avalanche Technology Group

http://avalanche.com.au/

Thank you. I see you last comment and this is good explanation for problem.

I started with a my own "community" chef-server and work with it a year ago.

I have a very long time for decide: "I need it(chef-server) or not"

I could not decide using only chef-server, using chef-solo with berks or

use server with berks.

What stopped you? What do you choose?

--

Best regards,

CVision Lab System Administrator

Vladmir Skubriev