|
29.11.2013 16:22, Cassiano Leal пишет:
"
type="cite">
I have more
than one Chef Server, each with their own set of data bags,
roles, nodes, cookbooks, etc.
While I don’t commit my cookbooks to the chef-repo’ VCS, I
still maintain a cookbooks/ directory in it (which is on
.gitignore), and keep everything that’s part of that Chef
infrastructure under the chef-repo root path.
Cookbooks and their dependencies are managed and uploaded
using Berkshelf, so I only have the cookbooks I’m working on
under chef-repo/cookbooks.
I don’t ever use "knife cookbook upload”. Instead I use
“berks upload” from the cookbook’s root.
On Friday, November 29, 2013 at 09:54,
Vladimir Skubriev wrote:
29.11.2013 14:47, Kevin Yank пишет:
On 29 Nov 2013, at 2:27 pm, Kevin Yank <
">
>
wrote:
Is this how others are using Berkshelf with a
chef-repo, or have I missed something?
Answering my own question, I finally stumbled on
a GitHub Issue that explains it all. If only the
docs did as well!
I’ve posted my own summary for the curious:
--
Kevin Yank
Chief Technology Officer, Avalanche Technology
Group
Thank you. I see you last comment and this is good
explanation for problem.
I started with a my own "community" chef-server and
work with it a year ago.
I have a very long time for decide: "I need
it(chef-server) or not"
I could not decide using only chef-server, using
chef-solo with berks or
use server with berks.
What stopped you? What do you choose?
--
Best regards,
CVision Lab System Administrator
Vladmir Skubriev
I'am very interested in "How you are resolv situations when cookbook
deleted from berksfile, but but remains on the server ?
How to clean up all cookbooks on the chef-server ?
In other words: "How to maintain order on the server with cookbooks,
and not only with cookbooks, but also roles, databags, etc"
May be there are a common command of a knife to clean up all server
from existing data and then upload a new infrastructure by knife
upload and berks upload ?
--
Best regards,
CVision Lab System Administrator
Vladmir Skubriev
|