Re: mkfs and mdadm support

[Miguel Cabeça <cabeca@ist.utl.pt>]

Hi,


> I agree, this should be split up into an abstraction resource such  
> as raid or filesystem. I imagine an lvm2 provider would be awesome  
> for the filesystem resource.

In my head a 'volume' resource with  lvm2 and evms providers makes  
more sense...