- From: Adam Jacob <adam@opscode.com>
- To: chef@lists.opscode.com
- Subject: Re: mkfs and mdadm support
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:38:28 -0700
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Miguel Cabeça<cabeca@ist.utl.pt> wrote:
>
Having the partition stuff on the file_system resource doesn't seem right.
>
On the other hand where should it go? To a Partition resource like this?
>
>
partition '/dev/sda' do
>
device '/dev/sda'
>
table 'GPT'
>
partitions [ {:type => :raid , :start => '0GB' , :end => '5GB'} , {:type =>
>
:raid , :start => '5GB' , :end => '10GB'} ]
>
action :partition
>
end
+1 for a Partition resource.
I'm very excited about these providers - that is super cool functionality.
Adam
--
Opscode, Inc.
Adam Jacob, CTO
T: (206) 508-4759 E: adam@opscode.com
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, (continued)
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, snacktime, 06/12/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, snacktime, 06/12/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, Ezra Zygmuntowicz, 06/12/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, snacktime, 06/13/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, Arjuna Christensen, 06/13/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, snacktime, 06/13/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, snacktime, 06/18/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, Arjuna Christensen, 06/19/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, Adam Jacob, 06/19/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, Miguel Cabeça, 06/24/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, Adam Jacob, 06/24/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, snacktime, 06/24/2009
Re: mkfs and mdadm support, Miguel Cabeça, 06/09/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.