- From: snacktime <snacktime@gmail.com>
- To: chef@lists.opscode.com
- Subject: Re: mkfs and mdadm support
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:59:25 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Ky0aaQNdesU8TPL1S8bn0nmHXtk8wNbFHenawIYzSL0W4rCH4q4y46yqdWJpIskAHs N0SML9o/BKkNiwksjwydRGpV4Jii9T59daKc/ZpgRArCn/MyD5SBSwOqhjME4oAX1FBh yKsqAg/fpXV5O3KlKdZ5nlYKXzDeXauVaE7i8=
Just an update on these. I was kind of under the weather this last weekend. I wrapped up most of the spec tests last night, so almost there.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Adam Jacob
<adam@opscode.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Miguel Cabeça<
cabeca@ist.utl.pt> wrote:
> Having the partition stuff on the file_system resource doesn't seem right.
> On the other hand where should it go? To a Partition resource like this?
>
> partition '/dev/sda' do
> device '/dev/sda'
> table 'GPT'
> partitions [ {:type => :raid , :start => '0GB' , :end => '5GB'} , {:type =>
> :raid , :start => '5GB' , :end => '10GB'} ]
> action :partition
> end
+1 for a Partition resource.
I'm very excited about these providers - that is super cool functionality.
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, (continued)
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, snacktime, 06/12/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, Ezra Zygmuntowicz, 06/12/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, snacktime, 06/13/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, Arjuna Christensen, 06/13/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, snacktime, 06/13/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, snacktime, 06/18/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, Arjuna Christensen, 06/19/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, Adam Jacob, 06/19/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, Miguel Cabeça, 06/24/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, Adam Jacob, 06/24/2009
- Re: mkfs and mdadm support, snacktime, 06/24/2009
Re: mkfs and mdadm support, Miguel Cabeça, 06/09/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.